are you going to take that down or wait for someone else to do it and bring a dog to visit you?

.

sisterC wrote:are you going to take that down or wait for someone else to do it and bring a dog to visit you?

Are pictures of costume-wearing bong-woofers prohibited here?

AZGman wrote:Are pictures of costume-wearing bong-woofers prohibited here?

yeah, and what about bong-wearing costume-woofers? I was gonna post that one, but maybe, now, I have to hold off.

BrotherD wrote:they are too busy, all corp-ed up now. and you know i have a problem with authority

your choice. but you know what will happen...

AZGman wrote:Are pictures of costume-wearing bong-woofers prohibited here?

that photo was a problem back in the product thread. got the dog called in several times!

stlwooter wrote:yeah, and what about bong-wearing costume-woofers? I was gonna post that one, but maybe, now, I have to hold off.

maybe if it wasn't a pix of a nun and bong it would be ok...i'll have to post me with my bong later!

.

BrotherD wrote:It lived for brotherR last night for 4 minutes. I think this is a new record. Woot has a poor work ethic

but he the sense to take it down.

.

.

BrotherD wrote:nope, they did it for him

I'll remove it...

i thought he took it down.

And what makes this picture so notorious? Is it the implicitly illegal act itself or the appearance of socio-religious hypocrisy that a servant of God is engaged in an implied illegal activity?

AZGman wrote:And what makes this picture so notorious? Is it the implicitly illegal act itself or the appearance of socio-religious hypocrisy that a servant of God is engaged in an implied illegal activity?

a lot of both would be my guess.

though what was it that bro r found or maybe it was br j...something from zilla's thread...