tennbeekeeper wrote:Off the tie subject, sadly, it is the time of the year that the lady bugs start finding some way into my house! How do you keep lady bugs out? I don't even know how they find a way in!

google showed me this. Good luck.

tennbeekeeper wrote:Off the tie subject, sadly, it is the time of the year that the lady bugs start finding some way into my house! How do you keep lady bugs out? I don't even know how they find a way in!

The only thing I would know of is seal everything.

KtCallista wrote:google showed me this. Good luck.

Wow... I wish just a lemon-scented candle would work. I am guessing they are getting in around some weathered stripping at the bottom of the windows, then. Thank you for the link; that was some good information!! Especially liked knowing they aren't feeding on anything inside.

dontwantaname wrote:I can't find any PM from you today! Are you sure you sent it? Cut and paste it and send it again!

So, strange! It is in a PM thread that already existed... I will try again.

tennbeekeeper wrote:So, strange! It is in a PM thread that already existed... I will try again.

Tried quoting you to see if that worked.

dontwantaname wrote:Maybe I deleted the thread?

Do you see anything, now?

Edit: Yes, I see you have seen it. Good!

OK, now it is time for me to go to sleep. My eyes are bugging out.

dontwantaname wrote:Good night Tennabee!

Thanks! Wish I had more time to chat.
Hope you have a great rest of the week! I will try to get back here tomorrow during the day.

This is a measure of how much Woot has changed.

Misfits hasn't been posted in for three days.

Yet it's still on the first page of threads on EBW.

Where the holy hell are the feet??!

, er ... I mean "Bump."

gwp wrote:This is a measure of how much Woot has changed.

Misfits hasn't been posted in for three days.

Yet it's still on the first page of threads on EBW.

Where the holy hell are the feet??!

, er ... I mean "Bump."

yeah, though two of those days have been wootoff days, and some thing's seriously wrong with woot. I get server errors now, whenever I try to log out or in, or just refresh the page on regular woot.com. shirt.woot isn't really any better. by the way, you only have to do that italics thing once in the word for it to work.

That's funny, I don't remember seeing a gwp post in the last couple of days.

pooflady wrote:That's funny, I don't remember seeing a gwp post in the last couple of days.

I was thinking the same thing.

gee its been awhile since anyone has said anything over here. . . Where are you hiding KT?

killingtime wrote:GENERAL NOTE: This thread, generally, is not a "light topic/passive" thread.

Yeah, right, Ms. Time, whatever you say.

killingtime wrote:I consider the posters that visit this thread - friends, supporters and intellects. I feel fortunate to have them post here. If you are a poster that has a different agenda that significantly alters the atmosphere/community that we have so carefully created here, it would be a universal loss.

Sure, Ms. Time, like anyone ever posts anything here...especially you. What atmosphere?

I claim salvage rights!

New Management Headquarters

dontwantaname wrote:Mr1, can you make the photos fit on the page?
At least on my little laptop, they are messing up the page

Ms. Name,
How big a pic will fit on your antiquated laptop?

edit: sigh.

Josephus wrote:yeah, though two of those days have been wootoff days, and some thing's seriously wrong with woot. I get server errors now, whenever I try to log out or in, or just refresh the page on regular woot.com. shirt.woot isn't really any better. by the way, you only have to do that italics thing once in the word for it to work.

Shouldn't you have a volunteer judge logo?

Goodbye, Mr. Whipple, we hardly knew ye.

no1 wrote:Sure, Ms. Time, like anyone ever posts anything here...especially you. What atmosphere?

I claim salvage rights!

DIGEST: "1. A thread initiator will not be held liable when it aggressively protects its rights to inspection within the time period stated; the thread initiator discards broken articles within the time period and before the thread has the opportunity to inspect; and the prospective salvager has a substantial defense involving facts discoverable by inspection of the items to overcome a prima facie case of liability. Where the salvager does not provide clear and convincing evidence of a substantial defense, the thread initiator remains liable for the damages. 2. Under the Wootism Memorandum of Understanding on Salvage, effective November 19, 2007, a salvager will not exercise its salvage rights when any single item is less than Bathysphere of Curmudgeons, or when the item is hazardous or dangerous to the health or safety of the thread initiator’s family unless it is an antique, figurine or crystal. For an individual item which has a depreciated replacement value of less than $50, the salvager will receive no credit for salvage. 3. The thread initiator is liable for damage to an item when the damage claimed at delivery is different from the damage documented on the inventory at origin."

CASE NO: 055505550
DATE: 11/19/2007

no1 wrote:Sure, Ms. Time, like anyone ever posts anything here...especially you. What atmosphere?

I claim savage rights!

You? a savage? seems unlikely.

tennbeekeeper wrote:Wow... I wish just a lemon-scented candle would work.

Maybe it has to be real lemon, try setting one on fire and see if that works.

Hi KT! Legalese made me go cross-eyed, I don't think I made it all the way through.

Kind of scary, there are lots of crazies out there.

killingtime wrote:DIGEST: "1. A thread initiator will blabbedy blabbedy blah.

Ms. Time,
Possession is nine tenths of the law.

that's weak possession.

Here's possession.

Josephus wrote:that's weak possession.

Here's possession.

You all are too funny. I was also wondering where KT has been. Nice to see her(?) back.

mphdavid wrote:You all are too funny. I was also wondering where KT has been. Nice to see her(?) back.

Yes, she's a she.

Hi KT!

from briars to fires

Josephus wrote:that's weak possession.

Here's possession.

She still has purty feet, though...

no1 wrote:

Clorox! Great.

pooflady wrote:Clorox! Great.