Ed3rd
quality posts: 9
Private Messages
In for 1!
I have had T40 and T41's at work and they tend to be rock solid compared to other laptops. Next best thing to a Toughbook in my opinion. One must respect a laptop with chromed screen hinges!
My favorite feature is the ThinkLight. According to the ThinkWiki, the T60 has one. Doesn't show it in the pics, but there is a tiny LED on the top edge of the screen which shines down on the keyboard. Toggled by Fn-PgUp. Great for on the airplane or taking those late night work calls without lighting up the room.
It's a krap! We cannot repel bags of this magnitude!
10/13/06 4/1/07 6/1/07 12/11/08 01/28/10 3/26/10
jeffiekins
quality posts: 50
Private Messages
TimJohn wrote:There's a review from over 5 years ago if you Google it. I don't see why you wouldn't spend slightly more for a netbook or tablet.
Because some people LIKE to have a decent-size screen AND keyboard! I write software, and while I CAN use my wife's netbook for 5-minute fixes, it feels like a half-hour with the tiny keyboard and screen. This is close enough to full-size that it's totally decent to type on. If you need to type, it makes a real difference.
And keyboards don't get any better than the ones on Thinkpads.
I'm supposed to buy something? But we're having so much fun with things as they are, I don't want to ruin it!
Purchases: 18 / 11 (nobody cares what, so I won't tell you);
Brownies of Cannabis: 1 / 12 (Thanks, Wootalyzer! -- would it help if I called them something else?).
jeffiekins
quality posts: 50
Private Messages
uncre8tv wrote:I didn't see who you were directing that at. But I think it's a great machine EXCEPT the 1024x768 drove me mad. I bought one of these and returned it for a T61, because the screen resolution was straight out of 1993. I think most students will experience the same screen shock when trying to use this machine.
I don't think so at all. It all depends on what you're used to. For 15", 1024x768 is a perfectly respectable resolution. Just set the screen preferences suitably (small icons and fonts) and I don't see why most people should mind. Just accept that you're more finicky than most about this particular point, and move on.
Personally, I prefer it, actually, since things are a little easier to see (you can actually read 9-point type without squinting), but maybe that's just my eyes. I find that 1024x768 looks just fine up to 16", and this is 15". (FWIW, 1280x1024 looks fine to most people up to 19".) Just because it looked good in '93 doesn't mean it looks bad now; the human eye hasn't changed much since then. (Well, mine have, but most...)
I'm supposed to buy something? But we're having so much fun with things as they are, I don't want to ruin it!
Purchases: 18 / 11 (nobody cares what, so I won't tell you);
Brownies of Cannabis: 1 / 12 (Thanks, Wootalyzer! -- would it help if I called them something else?).
Braveit1
quality posts: 2
Private Messages
True parellel and true serial port are still needed for some equipment. The parallel port contains voltage and signals that are not availiable on USB to Parallel adapters. I build some lighting controllers that can only use true parallel ports and others that still use serial ports (some USB to serial port adapters will work for these.) There are newer USB controllers making their way into the mainstream but for D.I.Y. controllers nothing is cheaper to build than a parallel port one. Just a solid state relay, an extension cord, and an old parallel port cable with an old version of vb6 and you can control up to 8 AC outlets with the computer. Add a few more components and that number goes up to 12. Warning, it becomes addictive. I have over 352 channels on my USB controllers for Holiday light shows and looking to triple that over the next year.
Woot Charter Member #3327