The original deal pioneer keeps on pinching pennies and cracking wise. No, that price isn't a typo.
Go to Woot
Last chance deals for hardcore cheapskates. Catch 'em before they - you guessed it - sell out.
Go to Sellout.Woot
The robots are coming! And so are the laptops, the tablets, the phones, the cameras, the TVs...
Go to Tech.Woot
High living at low prices with name-brand deals for your pad, crib, nest, or castle - inside and out.
Go to Home.Woot
Make it, build it, improve it. But whatever home project you've got in mind, start by saving money on it.
Go to Tools & Garden
Sports, fitness, and outdoors deals, because saving money is only one of your passions.
Go to Sport.Woot
You don't have to spend a lot to look like you do. Werk it and twerk it with amazing deals on designer watches, handbags and more.
Go to Accessories & Watches
Deals for moms and dads and anybody else who needs kids' stuff, from toys to baby gear to furniture to clothing.
Go to Kids.Woot
Our exclusive graphic tees will make you laugh, will make you cry, will make you look totally hot.
Go to Shirt.Woot
Direct from the winery to your thirsty lips: wine deals worth doing a spit-take over.
Go to Wine.Woot
398,315 deals (and counting)
from around the web, shared and ranked by a community of deal fiends like you.
Go to Deals.Woot.
Item: Bamboo Houndstooth Cover for iPhone 4/4S
Shipping Options: $5 Standard OR $9 Two-Day OR $12 One-Day
Search Amazon Search Google
Previous Similar Sales (May not be exact model)
6/11/2013 - $29.00 (Woot Plus)
4/11/2013 - $29.00 (Woot Plus)
3/12/2013 - $29.00 (Woot Plus)
2/21/2013 - $29.00 (Woot Plus)
1/28/2013 - $29.00 (Woot Plus)
That's funny.. a phone cover that must be handled with care. What's next, a bamboo padlock?
nullvalu wrote:That's funny.. a phone cover that must be handled with care. What's next, a bamboo padlock?
lol good point
Do you guys have the wrong answer again? 209*16 or 209*17 don't work. This is getting NeXT...
Why is the word 'l a me' being blocked?
What the crap am i doing wrong here...sum of ages = 209.... 17 cantos.... what is the friggen answer....because 209 * 17 isnt correct apparently
ditto to 209*16 and 209*17 not working :/
209 x 16 or 17 isn't working for me either
209*17=3553 (or translated into wootese, 404)
bubbawoot wrote:What the crap am i doing wrong here...sum of ages = 209.... 17 cantos.... what is the friggen answer....because 209 * 17 isnt correct apparently
Same here. That's the right answer. Unless you say that the 17th canto wasn't finished, so it doesn't count, but that still doesn't work
Ugh - so annoying - I also have the 209*17 - Wiring the Future!?
DMDrew812 wrote:209*17=3553 (or translated into wootese, 404)
Woot has the wrong answer again... You'd think they'd double check these.
yeah, I got 209*17 too which isn't working. Anybody stumble across the "correct" wrong answer yet?
Mancho wrote:Same here. That's the right answer. Unless you say that the 17th canto wasn't finished, so it doesn't count, but that still doesn't work
That's what I figured. Neither 16 nor 17 work though.
It's amazons fault that Woot can't even double check their work anymore.
Same problem (56+49+58+46)*16 or 17 do not work. :/
They have it as 206*17=3502....but its gone already
Yes I also had 3553. Woot owes us a Board of Circuits for their bad google skills.
206 x 17
Apparently the woot writers/technical staff are as clueless about math as the poor professor.
206*17 works, but regretfully for us it's the factually incorrect answer.
I also tried 16.5 for the number of cantos....that doesn't work either.
it should be 209 and 90
mickeygoldsmith wrote:They have it as 206*17=3502....but its gone already
How did you get 206?
great! (can you sense my massive amounts of sarcasm)
I'm getting the same answer, 209 * 16 or 17 depending, and 404...why woot?
jesusdeluxe wrote:206 x 17
How did you get 206?
How the hell did they get 206 instead of 209???
Sheesh, simple Math isn't a qualification to work with woot I guess lol
How do you come up with 209? I keep getting 198:
Edit: Crap never mind. I had age of inauguration, not assasination
fastfox wrote:206*17 works, but regretfully for us it's the factually incorrect answer.
Apparently Crapschimdt is really bad at math and/or facts.
Sold out right as I hit the last place order
Someone we not know about get assassinated recently. Or did the birth year of previous presidents change.
Sorry everybody - we had an issue with the URLs going live a couple minutes after the question was posted because we're dumb.
Lincoln was 56
Garfield was 49
McKinley was 58
Kennedy was 46
That adds up to 209
jlevin75 wrote:How do you come up with 209? I keep getting 198:
At least... according to Wikipedia.
View All →