Wootalyzer's Pricing Post! - Saving Woot prices for decades to come
------------------------------------------------------------
Invicta Men's Stainless Steel Watch
$79.99 + $5 Shipping
Condition: New

Product List:
- 1 Invicta Men's Swiss Quartz Stainless Steel Watch Model #2877

*DISCLAIMER* Wootalyzer! is in no way affiliated with Woot!, and this post may not always be here!

I have one and it is lame. Get a bucherer instead.

I have this exact watch. Very nice piece

I had one of these and it stopped working the day after I got it :/

hmm the watch seems interesting it looks nice it has a very nice finish if i needed a watch i would buy one

do you froogle? prices for various Invicta watches

Edit: The more specific froogle for this model is here.

Oh ok.. where's the women's watch?

It's not digital? What are those hands and numbers for?



/vjl/

QVC anyone?

Froogle

my cell phone tells time so i don't need a watch, and yes, 2008 is not as exciting as i thought it would be

meh. I prefer pocket watches.

I would argue that the Casio Waveceptor is a better deal - being atomicly sync'd and solar powered. I think that was on woot a while back, for the same price.

NICE WATCH!!! My brother has one like this, and it's pretty schweettt!!! I'd Woot, but got a new one for my Birthday.

Froogle

why do we need a watch? practically everyone has a cell phone, rendering a watch useless

SHOlover wrote:QVC anyone?

try bidz.com

Since I'm now on disability because of Multiple Sclersosis, I spend A LOT of time at the comptue, so all I have to do is look at the clock on the screen.

Thanks you, but I'll pass on this one.

- Ian

Believe me, you are paying for the name with this one, not the quality.

I wear fossil watches.........refurbished $39.95.

theuniverses wrote:why do we need a watch? practically everyone has a cell phone, rendering a watch useless

i totally agree.

I think this one will invite the ladies attention

My Fossil watch band broke on New Year's, and I was looking to get a classy watch for Christmas (but didn't get gifted with one).

How are Invicta watches? Flashy enough to get the occasional compliment but not over the top? How good of a deal is this woot!?

here - save $5!!! jejeje

Long ebay links are a bane

last time i bougt an expensive watch i broke it within 2 weeks and the replacment within 3. walmart watchs last me longer so no thanx

I got this watch last time it was on Woot! (well, mine has a lighter face, but the rest is the same) and I absolutely love it. But the water-resistance didn't work very well and it got some moisture in it. Removing the back and leaving it for a while fixed the problem, and now I just don't shower with it. Still love it.

nice watch...i can see the time on my phone though >.<

Invicta is a good Swiss brand watch, I've got one. This is a really good price, for a good watch.

Amazon and buy.com both have this sucker for $120, looks nice and I need a new watch. Tempting woot, tempting.

What put me off was the way the number 4 was written. It has Roman numerals so it should say IV and not IIII. See for yourself.....

I apologise if I missed where it says...but where is this watch made? North Korea? really?

great deal... not sure how many watches hubby needs though... most have too many as it is... p.s. late start... linkage will be updated shortly.... beep beep... and thar she blows friends... tons of them on the CSEs

Nah! Too much bling...

Should've been an Invicta Russian Diver's Watch. I've seen one in Costco (Da Bomb!)..

kerneltrap wrote:my cell phone tells time so i don't need a watch, and yes, 2008 is not as exciting as i thought it would be

Twist a wrist, Or take out your cell phone ? WoW americans are not lazy.

Still most wear a watch as with jewlery.

jejeje @ how ugly that watch is. My Vacheron Constantin is holding up fine.

Thanks Woot
Sandy106

What kind of watch is that?
it's a crap.
The real good watch should tell an international time.
crap crap crap crap crap crap crap crap

Happy New Year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

you guys think watches are for telling time?

if i was a nurse taking a pulse maybe, or a pilot, but no im not

ZHK wrote:What put me off was the way the number 4 was written. It has Roman numerals so it should say IV and not IIII. See for yourself.....

+1

Dumb