mboverload
quality posts: 80
Private Messages
Craig234 wrote:My basic question is whether this is worth getting for me.
Now I have the lazy setup - Comcast HD ditial with an HD DVR ($10/month for that).
I've got some interestin switching for cost and not liking Comcast to Disk or U-verse,
However, if I make a change, one option is a PC used as a DVR - and so I'd like that considered competition' for the Tivo, too. I'm just not taht familiar with what it can and can't do. For example, how do people watch normal cable shows on that setup?
Having said all that, does the Tivo - which sound like it costs similar or a little more with a monthly or annual sub, I am not comfortable to get longer - make sense over all the alternatives?
The TiVo is just a joy to use. It's simple.
If you don't want to mess around with computers or use the horrible interface of cable DVRs then get the TiVo.
If you like messing with computers and tweaking and modifying or want to save money with your cable DVR don't buy it.
SUPER ULTRA CAR ANALOGY
It's like a nice Honda Accord EX. Sure, you could could get the cheap and horrible to drive Kia (Cable DVR) or the muscle car with tweaking (computer) but maybe you just want to drive in a nice reliable car with no drama.
If you want the Accord EX, get the TiVo.
112 woots and counting, since 2007. Don't ban me, bro!
mboverload
quality posts: 80
Private Messages
fairnymph wrote:So, I really want to do this. But is the HD quality really as good as with a landline cable? I'm EXTREMELY picky about image and sound quality. And how affected is your transmission by weather? I'd freak if I missed a show because of bad weather. And lastly - how does this work in wooded areas? I live in thick forest in semi-rural North Carolina, sort of on the outskirts of Chapel Hill.
Actually, over the air HD is higher quality than Cable. Cable companies compress the carp out of the signal and it looks horrible.
Although there are exceptions (like when stations broadcast multiple subchannels like KQED in California) the over the air will be higher quality.
112 woots and counting, since 2007. Don't ban me, bro!
SJCwineaux
quality posts: 3
Private Messages
fairnymph wrote:I only watch network TV - no special channels - so this sounds really appealing, and I hate paying for cable when I only watch 5 channels! Actually, I used to watch SF but now there is no longer anything good on air.
So, I really want to do this. But is the HD quality really as good as with a landline cable? I'm EXTREMELY picky about image and sound quality. And how affected is your transmission by weather? I'd freak if I missed a show because of bad weather. And lastly - how does this work in wooded areas? I live in thick forest in semi-rural North Carolina, sort of on the outskirts of Chapel Hill.
Over the air is higher quality (less compression) than most cable / satellite TV if you receive it at all! If you have an HDTV, you should be able to test what you will see by using the tuner in your TV. I've found it is all or nothing and very good if you get it. (Of course I'm assuming you have an antenna. If not, you sort of have to commit without seeing the picture. The antennaweb.org website will give you an idea what to expect.)
Got to remember: Buy less, drink more!