bmw66x
quality posts: 48
Private Messages
Love the write-up. Pure gold! Jerry, it's GOLD!
I'm Bryan. Nice to meet you, Wooter.
bmw66x
quality posts: 48
Private Messages
12x optical zoom? Boy, I thought my 5x optical zoom was good...this is awesome! Great for stalkers, I guess.
I'm Bryan. Nice to meet you, Wooter.
Shinespark
quality posts: 29
Private Messages
quantamm wrote:Panasonic a couple of years ago modified the firmware in their cameras so only Panasonic brand batteries would work. Does anyone know if they still prevent you from using a third-party battery?
Yup.
It's been 20 years, I am going to copy that floppy.
Shinespark
quality posts: 29
Private Messages
bassanimation wrote:Just wanted to say that we bought one of these from Woot a few months ago. It is a terrific camera. It takes better pictures than my $800 Pentax digital SLR. Well worth the money.
Even if it was a POS *ist I wouldn't buy that on pixel pitch alone, as well as crummy lens resolution. Though it certainly may be hard to tell at web sizes at EV 12+.
(that being said, this is a decent compact, particularly for a superzoom)
It's been 20 years, I am going to copy that floppy.
Shinespark
quality posts: 29
Private Messages
flyngwalrus wrote:I have a slightly older Panasonic camera. Pretty fantastic, always been happy with it.
But like CNet says - low light is pretty awful.
Yeah, it's about what you can expect from a Matsushita 1/2.4" (noisier than the Sonys on many other compacts) but honestly you won't get much better without a larger sensor or backside illumination.
It's been 20 years, I am going to copy that floppy.
Shinespark
quality posts: 29
Private Messages
haveabigjohnson wrote:So between this camera and the Samsung with the Schneider lens they had on here awhile ago, which was better? http://www.woot.com/forums/viewpost.aspx?postid=4108294
I have a greater affinity for the HZ30W but part of that is my dislike for Panasonics UI, and the history of so-so low-light on the LX/ZS series.
Don't worry about the lens branding, it's decent for a compact lens but it's mostly marketing. It isn't any more "Leica" than the "Schneider" on the Samsung or the "Zeiss" lenses that Cosina and Kyocera have made for decades. All three companies started outsourcing production and licensing their brand names long ago.
It's been 20 years, I am going to copy that floppy.
Shinespark
quality posts: 29
Private Messages
ndquaker wrote:Well, part of the problem is that you bought a Pentax digital SLR. Many cameras would compare favorably. This Lumix is not to the level of a Canon G-series, but it has the critical elements of a very useful camera: fast lens, 25mm equivalent wide-angle, a large sensor, low shutter lag, and a long zoom. It also takes great pictures, even in relatively low light. It just isn't very small--not pocket-friendly for most. But it's a lot of camera for the money.
Is this where I mention that the Pentax K-5 has the best APS-C sensor on the market?
Also, the ZS series' sensors is typically sized.
It's been 20 years, I am going to copy that floppy.
Shinespark
quality posts: 29
Private Messages
haveabigjohnson wrote:I found this link http://www3.shopping.com/xSBS-Samsung-Samsung-HZ30W-12-Megapixel-Digital-Camera-Black-Panasonic-DMC-ZS6~PT-xPO~P-1~PRDLT-102364034-95828334
Interesting if you note the "proprietary battery" issue. The links I saw seemed to rate this one better than the Samsung. I guess I will pull the trigger on this one, since I missed the Samsung.
I wouldn't worry too much about the battery thing, as it's not the end of the world to suck it up and buy a OEM one every year and a half or so as they wear through.
It's been 20 years, I am going to copy that floppy.