Ringo4422
quality posts: 19
Private Messages
dpuett wrote:Actually, not quite. I have the DMC-ZS3 and it has the same feature. If I turn on the "Intelligent Resolution" feature, the camera reduces the resolution a little bit and the increase in zoom is optical. Not digital. It is a useful feature. http://panasonic.net/avc/lumix/compact/zs10_tz20/lens.html#intelligent_zoom
All marketing hype.
Vizio 32” 720p LCD HDTV (2 of them), Seagate 750GB SATA/300 7200RPM Hard Drive, SiliconDust HDHomeRun Dual Digital HDTV Tuner, Kodak Theater HD Player, Acer Aspire One 10.1” Netbook, Philips Prestigo 8-Device Universal Remote, Asus Eee PC 900 Netbook with 1.6GHz Atom Processor, Philips Upconverting DVD Player with DivX and HDMI, Ashley Rock Axe Full Size Rockband and Guitar Hero Controller for PS2 and PS3, Philips Icon 5 Device Universal Remote, and a bunch of other carp.
Ringo4422
quality posts: 19
Private Messages
Thank you for the quality post. I'm in for 1.
genii69 wrote:I bought this camera the last time woot had it also. I love the camera. I am constantly amazed at the things that I keep finding out that it does. By default the digital zoom is turned off. Even with it off the camera will go to 21x (intelligent zoom)as a posting before this one mentioned. When I first started using the camera I also thought that the 21x was the limit. Well after playing with a bunch of settings the other night, I found out that there is a setting for digital zoom. I know everyone is not crazy about digital zoom but once I turned it on I was able to go out to 84.1x. Wow! It is digital but you can sure see far away with that setting. Anyway, I normally run it at 16x or less in IA mode but I have done some interesting things with burst mode (10 pictures per second). Even when not using burst I find that the shutter speed is very quick. I took a photo of a helicopter in flight and in the picture the blades look as if they are standing still with no motion blur that I can detect at all.
The 1080i 60fps video is incredibly smooth. The stabilization works better than any I have seen before. I took a couple of videos where I was intentionally shaking the camera up and down (several inches) and it came out in the video as a mild rocking. Snip...
...
Vizio 32” 720p LCD HDTV (2 of them), Seagate 750GB SATA/300 7200RPM Hard Drive, SiliconDust HDHomeRun Dual Digital HDTV Tuner, Kodak Theater HD Player, Acer Aspire One 10.1” Netbook, Philips Prestigo 8-Device Universal Remote, Asus Eee PC 900 Netbook with 1.6GHz Atom Processor, Philips Upconverting DVD Player with DivX and HDMI, Ashley Rock Axe Full Size Rockband and Guitar Hero Controller for PS2 and PS3, Philips Icon 5 Device Universal Remote, and a bunch of other carp.
radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
JonSnow wrote:Seriously why does this question come up every single time? It's 16x optical PLUS 5x digital zoom. Not that difficult to understand.
Actually, for a lot of new buyers not familiar with digicam hype, putting a 21x zoom sticker on a 16x zoom camera IS that difficult to understand.
Digital zoom is a joke, a fraud, a scandal.
It is simply in-camera cropping, something you can do at home with any camera using editing software.
The problem is that somebody may think they are taking a glorious, tight zoom shot at 14 mp, when they really are cropping it down to a 5 mp image.
Granted, that is still not as bad at it used to be with 3 MP cameras, but it is a lie, fraud, etc., designed to make cameras look more attractive..kind of a digital comb-over that only fools some.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.
radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
skiddyfisk wrote:Yet another camera lacking RAW support :[ why, woot, why?
RAW is for people who want to spend a lot of time at their computer, editing the photo. This is not the mass-market crowd's idea of a good time. How many film photographers had a darkroom? A tiny fraction ..the rest just dropped off their film. I see that even the option of shooting TIF files is gone, in most cases.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.
onefastwienerdog
quality posts: 6
Private Messages
There must be a ton of these that have been returned, Look at Panasonic microwave ratings....Junk!!!!
Panasonic was our 1st choice but after reading all the bad reviews we passed on Panasonic.
Panasonic used to make good stuff but not so good anymore.
We just got a Nikon S8100 camera and it works great.
Random crap #1 11-28-09-Nice
Random crap #2 08-20-10-Sucked