Shinespark
quality posts: 29
Private Messages
NocturnalOne wrote:That's also a decent laptop but it's difficult to compare Intel and AMD processors.
Not really, if you know the product line.
Even though it's an Arrandale, a Pentium will outdo the E-350 in everyday tasks, though the APU will drastically outperform the Intel integrated graphics controller on any rendering/video task.
That other one has a chiclet keyboard as well.
coryb13 wrote:
Because neither of the laptops can be used for gaming, the graphics, for most people, will not mean much.
Oh ye of little faith.
In what world does 4GB of PC-10600 cost $40?
It's been 20 years, I am going to copy that floppy.
Shinespark
quality posts: 29
Private Messages
brucedoesbms wrote:More like bottom-end when compared to the Top 10 Common CPUs...
That's one of the most misleading graphs I've ever read. Every single one of those other processors save one is a desktop CPU.
It's been 20 years, I am going to copy that floppy.
jc007
quality posts: 2
Private Messages
Perfect specs for UBUNTU Linux
http://www.ubuntu.com/
You won't believe how fast a machine like this is after you free it from windows!
-JC
If I Agreed With you, Then we would BOTH be wrong
Shinespark
quality posts: 29
Private Messages
theguruguys wrote:That's the speed of a netbook...
Not really, and that's comparing the rarer dual core pineviews.
The Radeon 6310 will also annihilate the GMA3150.
It's been 20 years, I am going to copy that floppy.
Shinespark
quality posts: 29
Private Messages
coryb13 wrote:Lol on the ye of little faith. I stand corrected, but I played starcraft 2 beta on my 8 year old 2.6ghz pentium 4 while my real computer was having a motherboard and processor replaced by Asus. Warranty, thanks Asus.
And its easy to find. Maybe even for $30 for a good set on sale. Check out newegg, or buy it full price for $27 at staples. Dunno how good it is, but it is kingston, and I like them.
http://www.staples.com/Kingston-4GB-1333MHz-DDR3-Non-ECC-CL9-SODIMM/product_376285
The GPU and low voltage are what saves it. I wouldn't try the same thing with the P6200 though, even if single-thread performance is superior.
And I meant that $40 seemed an egregiously high amount for memory to put in a low-end notebook.
gslander wrote:what? no trackpoint eraserhead?
http://xkcd.com/243/
It's been 20 years, I am going to copy that floppy.