radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
So am I blind, or is the "Discuss this deal" button moved? I had to go to the "community" tab to comment.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.
radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
bruce57 wrote:Find me a watch — especially a Timex" — that's branded Swiss Made on the dial for $49.95. There are minimum standards enacted by the Swiss government regarding content and labor before a watch can be branded "Swiss Made." That said, you might want to look into the current quality of Chinese watch movements before you denigrate them — especially Tianjin Sea-Gull, which makes a tourbillion movement that's fairly highly regarded for its cost. Is it Swiss Made? No — but as a tourbillion, neither is it $100,000+.
The Neptune is a pretty decent watch for $49.95. It's not a chronograph; just a simple three-handed watch that keeps good time, with a shaped silicone ring around the case that gives it the "look" of a deep diver's watch...again, without the price of one.
A Timex, huh? Wow. I bet you're one of those guys who still yearns for a Twist-O-Flex watchband, too, eh?
Thank you defender of all things Chinese.
This watch with the insane MSRP reminds me of the cheap Cross pen knock-offs that have a $75 MSRP and are at the dollar store.
Actually my Timex is also Chinese, but the dial lights up, the finish has not worn off in two years and it doesn't look like something from the 80's.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.
radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
bruce57 wrote:LOL...gotta love it when someone's attempt at sarcasm bites themselves. If you've had your Chinese Timex for two years, I guess you've been supporting them longer than I have. As for this watch looking like something from the '80s, they didn't make big watches in the '80s. They made little puny ones. Like your Timex.
You're right...it looks like a garish sucka from the 70's!
And at least my Chinese Timex doesn't try to fool chumps by pretending it is Swiss.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.
jearly0000
quality posts: 1
Private Messages
Kev50027 wrote:While I agree that the watch is big, I don't think it's ugly. If it were half the thickness and was solar powered I would consider it.
With regard to your ignorant comment about the fad of a clock on your wrist, I suppose you must have been born in the 90's or 2000's, because this "fad" has lasted since the 17th century. Wrist watches became popular in the 1920's (before that, it was pocket watches). So this "fad" has lasted at least 90 years, and at most over 200 years. I suppose you think cars, houses, and airplanes are fads too.
WHOOOOOOSH!
Who ate the last mini chimichanga?!