luke975
quality posts: 14
Private Messages
nanaejt wrote:You do know that you don't need glasses to watch this TV you only need the glasses when watching a 3D movie.I don't think anyone would only watch 3D movies but for the few extra dollars why not have that option. I have a 32" 3D passive Tv in my home office and I love that option,I will not buy another HD TV without 3D.
Also if you're dumb looking you can blame the glasses so that's a plus
right. The only thing I said initially was that 3d was a gimmick. which several other people after me posted also. Yeah it's a fad that will pass. unless you're 3 and like to think you're actually petting the dog on tv.
to the woot staff member that screwed up the back2skool code so I could get a lot of nice things for free - thank you.
luke975
quality posts: 14
Private Messages
ashli143 wrote:That's your opinion (I really don't want to start an argument - no good with confrontation). There was also others who claim to like the 3d option. I love my 3d tv, and yeah I am kind of childish. My daughter and I have a blast with it. Also, if you're playing games and drinking with your buddies its pretty awesome. I personally would not recommend an active 3d, but maybe look at a passive 3d in the future (maybe...). I'm sure you would prefer this over the thick glasses of the active.
I just read Green Eggs and Ham with my daughter last night... I'm kinda feeling like Sam-I-Am... try it, come on, you'll like it! 
lol. that's cool. to each their own. just think it's expensive for a feature I don't thinks important. and I like dr seuss too, he has a few things at universal orlando.
to the woot staff member that screwed up the back2skool code so I could get a lot of nice things for free - thank you.